<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Author Max: Great DITA, Great Documentation &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://methodm.com/blog/index.php/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://methodm.com/blog</link>
	<description>for people who write and edit content everyday</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 11:03:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The DITA Project #5 choices or choicetables?</title>
		<link>http://methodm.com/blog/2011/11/09/the-dita-project-5-choices-or-choicetables/</link>
		<comments>http://methodm.com/blog/2011/11/09/the-dita-project-5-choices-or-choicetables/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 11:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>katriel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DITA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minimalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical Documentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://methodm.com/blog/?p=52</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why use &#60;choices&#62; or &#60;choicetables&#62; instead of &#60;ol&#62; or &#60;ul&#62; in a task topic when you need to choose what to do next?
The benefit is that the markup is semantic!  When you use &#60;choices&#62; or &#60;choicetables&#62;, the machine (and the writer!) understands explicitly if we are talking about:

&#60;choices&#62; where the customer has reached a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why use &lt;choices&gt; or &lt;choicetables&gt; instead of &lt;ol&gt; or &lt;ul&gt; in a task topic when you need to choose what to do next?</p>
<p>The benefit is that the markup is semantic!  When you use &lt;choices&gt; or &lt;choicetables&gt;, the machine (and the writer!) understands explicitly if we are talking about:</p>
<ol>
<li>&lt;choices&gt; where the customer has reached a decision point and must choose one of the  options (such as,  take Route 66 to Boston or Route 81 to Ithaca).<br />
or</li>
<li>&lt;choicetable&gt; &#8212; where the customer has different options to get to the same result (such as CTRL+S or File &gt; Save).</li>
</ol>
<p>Using &lt;ol&gt; or &lt;ul&gt; eliminates semantic markup! Using &lt;choices&gt; or &lt;choicetables&gt; explicitly indicates the kind of juncture the reader has reached &#8212; and forces the writer to state if no matter what the choice, the end result will be the same (&lt;choicetable&gt;), or if the choice selected will lead to a different outcome (&lt;choices&gt;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://methodm.com/blog/2011/11/09/the-dita-project-5-choices-or-choicetables/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.245 seconds -->

